ABSTRACT
IntroductionThe global pandemic of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) began in Wuhan, China, in December 2019, and has since spread worldwide.[1] This study attempts to summarize current evidence regarding major inflammatory markers, severity predictors and its impact on outcome, which provide current clinical experience and treatment guidance for this novel coronavirus. MethodsThis is a retrospective observational study done at an urban teaching covid-19 designated hospital. Hospital data were analysed with aim of studying inflammatory markers, predictors and outcome. Patients were classified in Mild, Moderate, Severe & Critical categories of COVID cases. Their clinical parameters, laboratory investigations, radiological findings & Outcome measures were studied. Strength of association & correlation of those parameters with severity and in-hospital mortality were studied. ResultsA total 204 (N) patients were clinically classified into different severity groups, as per MOHFW and qCSI(quick Covid Severity Index) guidelines, as Mild (34), Moderate (56), Severe (39) and Critical (75). The mean(SD) age of the cohort was 55.1+13.2 years; 74.02% were male. Severe COVID-19 illness is seen more in patients more than 50 years of age. COVID-19 patients having IHD develop worse disease with excess early in-hospital mortality. Respiratory rate & Heart Rate on admission are correlated with severe and stormy disease. Among Inflammatory markers, on admission LDH, D-Dimer and CRP are related with severity and excess in-hospital death rate. ConclusionAdvanced age, male gender, IHD, Respiratory Rate & Heart Rate on admission were associated with severe covid-19 illness. S. Lactate Dehydrogenase & D-dimer was associated with severe covid-19 illness and early in-hospital death.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections , DiseaseABSTRACT
ObjectivesConvalescent plasma (CP) as a passive source of neutralizing antibodies and immunomodulators is a century-old therapeutic option used for the management of viral diseases. We investigated its effectiveness for the treatment of COVID-19. DesignOpen-label, parallel-arm, phase II, multicentre, randomized controlled trial. SettingThirty-nine public and private hospitals across India. ParticipantsHospitalized, moderately ill confirmed COVID-19 patients (PaO2/FiO2: 200-300 or respiratory rate > 24/min and SpO2 [≤] 93% on room air). InterventionParticipants were randomized to either control (best standard of care (BSC)) or intervention (CP + BSC) arm. Two doses of 200 mL CP was transfused 24 hours apart in the intervention arm. Main Outcome MeasureComposite of progression to severe disease (PaO2/FiO2< 100) or all-cause mortality at 28 days post-enrolment. ResultsBetween 22nd April to 14th July 2020, 464 participants were enrolled; 235 and 229 in intervention and control arm, respectively. Composite primary outcome was achieved in 44 (18.7%) participants in the intervention arm and 41 (17.9%) in the control arm [aOR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.67, 1.77]. Mortality was documented in 34 (13.6%) and 31 (14.6%) participants in intervention and control arm, respectively [aOR) 1.06 95% CI: -0.61 to 1.83]. InterpretationCP was not associated with reduction in mortality or progression to severe COVID-19. This trial has high generalizability and approximates real-life setting of CP therapy in settings with limited laboratory capacity. A priori measurement of neutralizing antibody titres in donors and participants may further clarify the role of CP in management of COVID-19. Trial registrationThe trial was registered with Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI); CTRI/2020/04/024775.